skip navigation

Latest News

  Is a Caravan a Home? 
  Bankruptcy and Your Home  
  Trees Do Not a Forest Make 
  Covenant Prohibits Lawful Use  
  Home Information Packs - New Changes  
  Lenders get Tough as Negative Equity Rises 
  Clarity Lacking - Common Sense Prevails 
  Holiday Bungalow is not a Dwelling  
  Right of Way - Intention Doesn't Count 
  Estate Agents - Compulsory Redress Scheme Registration  
More...

Phone Masts - The Law and Practice

Although a very recent technological development, the mobile phone is considered a necessity by many people in the UK. However, despite their popularity, the communication masts on which the networks depend have been regarded, since their inception, as eyesores and, in the eyes of many, as health hazards.

As a result, proposals to site mobile phone masts often lead to disquiet on the part of those living or working in the surrounding areas.

A ground-based mast over 15 metres in height requires planning permission, but those attached to other structures or which are less than 15 metres in height require approval under the so-called ‘pre-approval’ system. Under this system, the network operator will apply to the local planning authority (LPA) for a decision as to whether pre-approval is required and, where appropriate, for a decision. The LPA has eight weeks to carry this out and to inform the applicant. If the LPA does not reply within the set period, then the network operator can proceed. The LPA is allowed to consider a variety of factors when deciding if permission should be granted. For example, the presence of nearby residential property and schools is a relevant factor. The LPA can require that a full application for planning permission is made.

Health concerns over masts that meet international standards on ionising radiation (and it is safe to say that all masts for which permission is sought will meet the standards) have not been accepted by the courts as a valid argument for denial of permission. Although the guidance on masts states that LPAs should consult with a school, when a mast is to be sited nearby, and take account of their views, the guidance as to what constitutes ‘near’ is not specific.

Perhaps oddly, a challenge on the basis of damage to the aesthetics of the area may well be more successful, especially if an alternative location can be suggested which does not create an environmental scar.


Moblie phone companies do have extensive rights of compulsory purchase - a fact which should be considered if you are thinking about granting a 'temporary' licence to one to place an aerial on your land.



 
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.
 
 

Steed & Steed Solicitors, 76-82 & 86 Coggeshall Road, Braintree, Essex, CM7 9BY 01376 552828
6, Gainsborough Street, Sudbury, Suffolk CO10 2ET 01787 373387
© Steed & Steed Solicitors. All rights reserved.

Legal Disclaimer

Steed & Steed Solicitors is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)
[smaller] Change text size [larger]